Strong City

The American Inquisition

It is truly an amazing spectacle to watch the State make its moral judgments upon the human beings who constitute its citizenship.  When religious people make moral judgments, it is usually based on some written expression by prophets or sages of the past or from the unction of the Spirit.  It is based on “the book” or on the Voice Who speaks to the heart.  In America there has been this declaration which professes that the State will not legislate religion or make moral judgments on its citizens.  This is found in the first amendment of the Constitution. 

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

First of all, it would be helpful to see what this actually says.  Let us put this in very plain, modern English.

“The government shall make no laws governing religion, or any laws that prohibit people from exercising their religion freely, or keep a people from speaking freely, or restrict the free publication of information.  The government shall pass no laws against its people that would keep them from assembling peaceably or keep them from being able to redress their grievances by petition to the Government.”

In other words, in regard to speech and religion, and one’s moral code, the government should keep its hands off.  The reason for this is that the government has the power of enforcement, and one’s religion or faith should not be enforced by the guns of the State.

It is a valid argument that religious societies should be able to make moral judgments.  But religious societies do not have the freedom to enforce those moral judgments upon other people, using guns.  Religious societies should be able to preach their moral judgments to others, but they should not be given guns to enforce those moral judgments.  In that way, human beings can decide for themselves what their religious morality will consist of, instead of being forced by the religious morality of someone else.  At one time it was even decided by the state church whether or not a man could believe that the earth was round.  In past ages, if a man believed that the earth was round he could be persecuted for that belief.

When the State begins to decide what one’s religious morality should be, or what he should believe in, then the problems begin, and religious persecution commences as it has done here with us. 

The function of the State may very well be to keep people from hurting other people, or punishing those who commit murder or who steal from its citizens, when there is a complaint filed against an offender by another citizen.  If a man claims to have been robbed, it is the State’s office to redress the issue.  But if the State sees someone wearing a cross and makes the moral judgment that crosses are bad for people, and persecutes the cross wearers, then the State crosses the line. If the State laws reflect that they do not like the way people shake hands, and that if they shake hands a certain way then the people will lose their children, the State then crosses the line.  If there is a crime, there must be a victim in order for the State to act upon it, and not just act from a moral hunch, or an opinion that such and such is wrong to do.  If there is no victim, there is no crime.

It is public knowledge that Strong City is under an interdict from the State of New Mexico.  The State has decided that it is against the law for minors to live here with grown-ups.  The State decided that we shake hands funny here, so minors should not be here for us to shake hands with.  The rumors fly, and I heard yesterday that I was having sex with 12-year-olds.  Well, I am not having sex with 12-year-olds, or teenagers, and I have not had sex with any minors.  Rumors always fly, and extreme exaggerations are always present when one sets himself up as a moral judge.  But the issue is not about what I have done and how appropriate it may or may not be.  The issue is, does the State have the morality to judge morality?  Can the secular State decide if God is doing the right thing or not?  How would the secular state even know how to judge something of a spiritual nature?

The science of touch is not new.  When God had these seven young women come to me in order to be touched, it was a deep, moving experience for them.  They were healed of many of their emotional “terrors.” Those “terrors” are common to man, and often exist in everyone at some time in their lives.  People grow up with guilt, and fear, or some unfathomable paranoia.  The societies of the world deal with these things through counseling, education, or simply by life’s experiences.  But God had these young women have these things dealt with by touch.  Their nakedness was the physical expression of their yielding acceptance of their healing.  This healing also consisted of a spiritual bonding, and they bore testimony in regard to this.  These healing events that took place over the period of about a year were natural and Spirit led.  God knows very well how He made people and what can heal them.  He knows our machinery.  But the Godless state knows nothing.  The beastly eyes of the secular machinery imagines the crimes out of its own demented nature and perverted legality.  It makes everything into sex or torture or some other imagined creation.  When I touched these young women, at their own request, it was far less invasive than if I had been giving them an ordinary massage, but the beast goes ballistic.  This force that has come against us is the force of the State that does not want anyone to follow anything as spooky as the Voice of God.  It is fashionable these days for everyone to be atheistic, and some people boast of it, but we happen to hear the Voice of God and follow it.  Is that not okay if we want to do that?  The State does not believe so.  The State believes that one can go to a church building and pretend to follow God, but if one actually does follow God the dragon makes war with him.

I have not been accused by any church member of sexually molesting them.  None of them, old, young, male or female, have accused me of rape, molestation, or coercion for sex or sexual favors or force to get sex, or any such thing.  I have had some outside of our community who are full of the devil, and full of their imagination, accusing me of all kinds of things, but the devil never has told the truth about the Sons of God or the activities of God.  The devil always puts a twist on things to make things other than what they are.  I expect the devil to make things up.  I know very well that some very “strange” things have happened here.  That is not the argument.  I sometimes stand in awe at it all, even now.  In history, God has done some unusual things, some of which were very offensive, but the real issue is whether God is in it or not.

You may remember Moses and how he was instrumental in killing all of the first born of Egypt.  Can you just imagine how mad everyone would be if I were to be instrumental in killing all of the first born of the United States in one night?  Well, that was Moses.  He plagued Egypt.  He was extremely offensive, illegal, and God-led.  I am accused of touching a girl while she was undressed.  The earth makes so much out of nakedness that it borders on insanity.  Nakedness is only a body without clothes on.  I recently read a story from Europe where 2000 people all stood naked for pictures.  It was to promote something, but I don’t know just what that was now.  From the looks of the picture, I am certain some of them, both men and women, bumped into each other.  Americans seem to be obsessed with the terrors or lusts of nudity, but I am not.  Naked is only naked, and it only means that someone does not have some clothes on.  I do not go crazy around naked human beings, as the State seems to do, and as most of our perverted population does.  But, the issue for us is that God decreed all of the offensive things that did happen, just so that wicked men could fall all over them.  It was on purpose and God has always worked in this way.  Moses was so offensive that Egypt went right into the Red Sea in their hot pursuit after him, pursuing him in their hot desire to be rid of him, and that was their end.  I wonder what this generation will receive while going after me.  I am very interested to know.

But something has changed in New Mexico.  What changed was that the State decided it would morally judge us here, and make up a crime that did not exist.  It would decide, through the offices of the CYFD and the Prosecutor, that I have conducted morally wrong acts and that our religion should be put under interdict, just as the Protestants were put under interdict by the Roman Catholic governors.  One of the buzz statements of the CYFD was that I “kissed like a husband would kiss a wife.” This meaningless, made up statement charged against me, was not because someone accused me of sex crimes.  It was because the CYFD has become the self-appointed authority on how a “husband would kiss a wife.” Just how do they judge that? Are they going by a manual that gives the length of time that a husband would kiss a wife? Or are they judging this by the location of the kiss? Or the hardness or softness of the lips? Do they have a stopwatch, and determine that if one kisses someone six tenths of a second, instead of three tenths of a second, then it constitutes sex?  So if I were to kiss someone who is under 18 for more than three tenths of a second, I would be having sex with a minor?  I don’t have a stopwatch so I don’t know the timing of my kisses, and I suggest that no one else knows either.  This sounds utterly ridiculous, I know, but it very much reveals the root issue.  And, since when has it been in the State’s authority to decide how someone should kiss and for how long?  I know it is nutty, but that is just what is going on in the great courtrooms of Clayton, New Mexico, and in the prosecutor’s office.  I cannot help but ask, “And this man was elected by the people of Clayton?” Is this man the reflection of the morality of Union County? I can hardly believe it. 

I would be very interested to know how the State differentiates between the way a loving “father would kiss his daughter,” as opposed to the way “a husband would kiss a wife.” And are there time limits on how long a father would kiss his son, or is there another time limit on cousins?  I would like to read the book on that, because I don’t think someone’s feelings about it would be a good judge. Don’t these people have anything else to do besides get into someone else’s business, or to regulate everyone else’s life, when they cannot even regulate their own?  Do all these people have to do today is get great big eyes over what the neighbors are doing? I think some of our neighbors might do well just paying attention to their cows.  I don’t think they have the intelligence to judge what God does here, since they do not have the heart to hear Him.

The State decided, through its CYFD and the Prosecutor, that by putting my hand on a sternum or some other non-sexual skin, that it constituted sexual contact.  But when a physician puts his hand on a sternum or even the breast of a woman, the State judges that as checking for lumps or something else.  Sure they are checking for lumps.  Two can play this game of imagination.  If I were to make an arbitrary moral judgment about doctors, and then make something up about them, like the State is doing with me, I could make up that doctors love pap smears because they get aroused during those times.  I could invent a story: I could say that I know, because they did a study on the blood pressure of doctors when they did pap smears, and in 90% of the doctors under 60, the blood pressure went up during those testing times. Do you see how anything can be made up and then “proven” by how the accuser feels about something?  Well, I have been watching the State making things up for a good while now, so I am just giving you a little example of how they come up with their moral judgments and their criminal “proof.” Should all doctors be indicted now for their “touching?” Doctors know that skin is not sex, so why is it that the State does not know that in my case here?  I think the State does know that, but it is convenient now to forget, because religious groups that do not take the mark of the beast need to be reigned in.  “Away with all of those people who hear God talk to them.”

I do not want to belabor the point of sternums and lips and skin, because this is not the issue.  The issue is, just when did the State become the self appointed judge of the religious morals of a church, as with the FLDS group in Texas?  The State does not even know what it is doing with them.  They kidnap the kids, and now they talk of giving the kids back.  HELLO!  Doesn’t anyone see that the world is run by the mentally challenged?  I think State government now is run by “Keystone Cops.” You know, those are the cops that run into each other while trying to tie their shoes. 

In the FLDS group it has been said that there are “underage” brides.  Since when does the State decide it has the right to judge when one is underage or not?  Individual states do not even agree at what age a minor is a minor.  In India some girls marry when they are 10.  My mother was 16.  Ancient Jews were married when they were 12 or 13.  The FLDS is a culture.  If a crime is committed, it is fair to gather a jury of FLDS peers and let them judge themselves.  Would that not be fair?  How would the secular State know what their morals are, or in what way that relates to their faith?  And why is it that the State listens to the devils and acts upon the reports of the adversary without even checking on the facts? The State workers and supervisors would be highly incensed if they and their children were treated the way that they treat children and their parents. Their day is coming, though. It is a law of the universe that “whatsoever you sow, that shall you also reap.” I have sometimes wondered if some of these children who were kidnapped would file a lawsuit against the State for one hundred million dollars, for crimes against them and their families, when there was no cause except the ineptness of the State.  Would it not seem reasonable that a family would get some redress from the incompetent intrusion by the State workers against their once happy family, subjecting them to all kinds of youthful terrors that will never be forgotten?  This may not be a problem in the natural way of life, for people choose where they want to be, but when the State uses force of arms to kidnap children from their happy family, that puts a whole new light upon it. 

I read a story today from a woman whose daughter was kidnapped by the State because her ex-husband reported that she was doing drugs in front of her daughter.  The husband was after the daughter so he intentionally lied that she was on drugs.  If the State had just asked the mother and done a little checking, it would have discovered that the mother did not even do drugs. So the little girl had to go through four months of hell and also a host of other problems later resulting from her kidnapping because the State does not have the brains or will to check anything out first.  Sometimes I think that idiots run State institutions of citizen control.  The demon possessed just love listening to the demon possessed.  When our own children were kidnapped, the police and CYFD workers had already determined that all was well because they had asked a few questions and gotten the facts.  Then, the next day, some new people came out, since the first group had come back with a good report, and took the kids without checking anything. They left with a bad report because all they did was kidnap kids so that they could put the kids through some personal hell.  I personally think that the CYFD should be disbanded until they can find people intelligent enough to run the organization in a way that will help people rather than hurt them.  These children are NOT their play things, and these incredible specimens of imbecilic humanity are going to have their day in heaven’s court yet.  I mean no offense to imbeciles.

The issue, once again is, does the State, who possesses the guns, and has proven conclusively that it is a mentally challenged organization of the clueless, have a legal right to judge the morals of a church when those morals are held as part of their faith and belief?  Does the State have a right to pull guns on those who believe in God, because their faith in God has made the dubious State laws secondary?  Would the people of America appreciate it if my church had the guns, and we imprisoned everyone on earth who did not live up to our standards of behavior?  If some church in America decided that holding hands or touching the hand of a female by a male was evil, and imprisoned everyone who did hold hands, as sexual contact felons, would that please the public?  I doubt it.  Yet, the State has come to our church and arbitrarily made that decision. The State decided that the children were in danger because God had directed a number of events here, witnessed by all, including God, over a period of a year during 2006 and 2007.  The State now judges that it has the moral right to decide what morality is and if God did the right thing.  This is entirely the subject of the Inquisition. 

Going back to the Constitution, we are now left with the spectacle that some of our children are now kept from exercising their religion freely or speaking freely because they are under 18.  Because these human beings who were kidnapped from here were under 18, the State made void their constitutional rights in one fell swoop of dictatorial injustice.  I fail to see this discrimination in the Constitution.  Our children are kept from their family and friends only because of the perverted moral judgment of the State, but not because of any crime committed, or any actual endangerment to the youth.  It is all imagined in the minds of the State representatives as it was with the FLDS.  The State has made a moral judgment concerning religious activities that were well documented and made public for more than a year.  Why didn’t the State do something then?  All parties to our experience here were fully appraised of all of the activities in this land, well documented in our movies and posts.  The State decided that it did not like our religion and that our healing movements did not meet the State’s ideas of acceptable religious behavior, even though it is provable that the State’s moral behavior could not possibly be used as an example for us.  If we practiced the State’s moral behavior we would be shot, or put in prison for life.  I think that any person with marginal powers of reason and observation knows that this is the truth.

Would my accusers like to have their morals displayed in living color, movies, and posts for everyone to read?  Would my accusers like a video made of their private lives?  I would seriously doubt it, for I know a few things about my accusers that they would not want me to make public.  But my life and times have been fully made public.  Everything I do is public knowledge.  We have told the whole story publicly.  The State would not dare to tell all as we have, or some of the State CYFD employees would go to prison.  But the horrific hypocrisy here can be seen in the natural “morality” of the State’s citizens.  The American culture is immoral to a great degree, as seen in its cinema, computer games, and videos.  How do they think that they can judge our church, since their own morals are from a cesspool?  The morals of America are wrecked, yet the State wants to judge our morals because it imagines that I may have touched someone somewhere?  God is the Judge of our morals, and we take the stand that the State has no right to judge God.

But there is more.  Americans are told how great America’s international morality is.  They are so proud of themselves as a nation.  But America single-handedly invaded a sovereign nation and was instrumental in the murder of over one million Iraqis.  That included many thousands of MINORS.  These underage children were maimed, raped, and robbed of their lives by American soldiers, American bombs, and the American mind of injustice.  A few Saudis are used to attack the World Trade Center, so Iraq is attacked.  Whoever put those morons in public office who concocted such a demented conclusion of things, should themselves be jailed along with the people they voted for.  The minors in Iraq had their private parts splattered all over the walls of their houses because some Saudis crashed a plane into our building.  Why is the government still in power?  Why is it okay for Mr. Bush to bomb the spit out of Iraqi minors, but it is not okay for me to touch a sternum?  Something doesn’t seem quite right to me here.

When I saw the illegal bombing done in Iraq and Serbia in order to overthrow the governments of those nations, I knew that the State would come for its own citizens soon and overthrow the governments of the churches and families.  My prophecy proved correct.  Through the Homeland Security Act, now Americans are the enemy of the State unless they are in the national slave labor camp and are following all of their beastly instructions.

Now, the State decides that it can judge the religious morals of the soul.  The State has decided that it is the conscience of the soul.  The State now claims to be the voice of God to the soul. And while it might not be bad for the State to make judgments, when those judgments are enforced with the force of arms, and that force is all based on falsehoods and lies, you then have a despotic rule and a true dictatorship.  There is no dictatorship on earth as true to the principles of a dictatorship as is the United States of America.  No nation on earth imprisons a greater percentage of its population than does the USA.  Our own children are imprisoned, and their only crime is that they are underage and that they happen to believe in me.  America has become a criminal state, but hypocritically professes righteousness.  There is no country any more evil than is America, for if it does not like the moral faith of a church, it pulls its guns and attacks.  America used to charge Communists and Nazis with crimes like these.  Now they seem okay with them.

Americans can just get used to the Inquisition until the beast is cast into the lake of fire.  We now are in a moment of judgment.  The beast itself is being judged.  The great hypocrisy and utter immorality of America’s professed morality is appallingly gross and perverted.  The legal system strains at an atom, while swallowing an oil tanker. 

The root issue here that is being exposed is that the State is now, by the force of arms, asserting its authority over the moral conscience of man, and then meting out its justice in a discriminatory way.  It operates purely from the principle of prejudice rather than by the true rule of law and justice.  This is revealed by some of our neighbors here in Union County and the media.  We have been accused of planning suicide for over seven years.  They never give up.  They keep saying it, not because there is any evidence for it, but only because they imagine it.  This borders on insanity, as any mental health clinic would plainly define the term.  It is insane mental behavior.  I think that these neighbors who keep talking suicide should tend to their poor herd of cows.  They have the mental capacity to feed cows and I think they should tend to that, rather than to keep opening the vain hole in their face and telling the same old suicide story.  Some of my neighbors are sick.  There is no other word for it.

Most Americans might feel somewhat smug just now, since they are not especially religious and the State is not coming for them.  But the time will soon come when all men will feel the impact of the assault upon human behavior, much more than is presently felt.  Every day the noose tightens.  Now it’s the cults, but next comes the families in a much greater way than before.  The attack on the family has been underway for many years.  This is all because the people have lost their minds.  The people are drunk on the wine of Babylon, and they have no more ability to think and reason, but only to react to the torments of their own demonic world.  I would say to the fools who run things, Get a Life.

From a 19th century prophet:

“...When...our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions (the control of the conscience of another by force), then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.” Maranatha, page 190

What were these “papal falsehoods and delusions” that the United States would adopt?  They are mentioned here by the same author:

“The Constitution of the United States guarantees liberty of conscience. Nothing is dearer or more fundamental. Pope Pius IX, in his Encyclical Letter of August 15, 1854, said: ‘The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty of conscience, are a most pestilential error—a pest, of all others, most to be dreaded in a State.’ The same pope, in his Encyclical Letter of December 8, 1864, anathematized ‘those who assert the liberty of conscience and of religious worship,’ also ‘all such as maintain that the church may not employ force.’ GC 565

“The pacific tone of Rome in the United States does not imply a change of heart. She is tolerant where she is helpless. Says Bishop O’Connor: ‘Religious liberty is merely endured until the opposite can be carried into effect without peril to the Catholic world.’” “The archbishop of St. Louis once said: ‘Heresy and unbelief are crimes; and in Christian countries, as in Italy and Spain, for instance, where all the people are Catholics, and where the Catholic religion is an essential part of the law of the land, they are punished as other crimes. GC 565

“Every cardinal, archbishop, and bishop in the Catholic Church takes an oath of allegiance to the pope, in which occur the following words: ‘Heretics, schismatics, and rebels to our said lord the pope, or his aforesaid successors, I will to my utmost persecute and oppose.’”  GC 565

Now you know what happened to the LOR and the FLDS.  You also know what will happen to everyone who does not receive the mark of the beast.  The days of freedom of conscience are ended even though the State speaks with a forked tongue saying all of the right things about peace, safety, religious liberty, justice and child protection, all in the same breath. 

Below is a statement by President George W. Bush.

“From its beginnings America has recognized the contribution of faith. We do not impose any one religion, instead we welcome all religions. We do not prescribe any prayer, we welcome all prayers. We respect every creed. We honor the diversity of our country and the deep conviction of our people. This is the tradition of our nation. That’s what makes us Americans.” President George W. Bush